Amicus curiae briefs are submitted by non-parties to an appellate case. They present information for the court to consider in deciding the appeal. However, certain rules govern the filing of these briefs. An experienced appellate
Appealing a Trial Court Decision in California Appealing a trial court decision can feel overwhelming, as though your case will stretch on indefinitely. In reality, however, appeals in California often move more efficiently than expected—and
Appellate Oral Arguments vs. Trial Arguments At Gusdorff Law, P.C., we focus exclusively on appeals. Our firm is dedicated to giving clients a clear and strategic voice in appellate courts across California. As experienced Los
When you have been granted damages in your trial and are eager to enforce the judgment promptly, encountering a defendant’s request for a stay of court proceedings can bring about certain expectations. A stay essentially
In the dynamic field of appellate law, attorneys frequently encounter a myriad of procedural challenges that test their expertise and adaptability. Janet R. Gusdorff, a seasoned appellate law specialist and the principal of Gusdorff Law,
In the intricate dance of legal practice, appellate attorneys often face a formidable opponent that transcends the courtroom: writer’s block. Janet R. Gusdorff, a seasoned appellate law specialist and the principal of Gusdorff Law, P.C.,
Following the Correct Procedure of Appeals There are certain principles of appellate procedure in California. The recent rejection of David Kilrain’s appeal in case no. 22CV01222 emphasizes the importance of following procedural rules and the
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Appellate Specialist Janet R. Gusdorff, Esq. Offers Expert Commentary to NYT on President Trump’s Court Battle Highlighting the Delicate Balance Lawyers Face in High-Profile Trials, Gusdorff Sheds Light on Strategy and Public
A Split in Opinion For years, California Courts of Appeal have grappled with how to apply the substantial evidence standard of review to findings that were made under the heightened “clear and convincing” burden of
U.S. Courts of Appeals are frequently called upon to interpret questions that arise in state law. Although they generally have the authority to do so, appellate judges may choose another route: certification. By certifying questions
A trial court hands down its judgment, to the disappointment of your client. A post-trial motion for new trial is denied, prompting an appeal. During the pendency of the appeal, certain facts come to light
The complexities of appellate practice make for plenty of potential landmines that can jeopardize a successful appeal. While some mistakes may at first seem incurable, there is often a way out of them. Working through
"*" indicates required fields